<a href="https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-6/gpt-5-6.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-6/gpt-5-6.pdf</a><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/latest-model" rel="nofollow">https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/latest-model</a><p><a href="https://x.com/levie/status/2075287443411222628" rel="nofollow">https:/
💬 评论区普遍认为GPT-5.6在基准测试和成本效率上超越Claude Fable,但也有人质疑其编码能力仍落后于Opus,且担忧定价过高。
<p>OpenAI's latest flagship model <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/">hit general availability this morning</a>, and comes in three sizes: Luna, Terra, and Sol (from smallest to largest).</p>
<p>The new models are priced per 1M input/output tokens as Luna $1/$6, Terra $2.50/$15, Sol $5/$30. For comparison, the Claude Opus series are $5/$25 and the Claude Fable 5 is $10/$50, but price-per-million tokens doesn't tell us much now that the number of reasoning tokens can differ so much betwee
OpenAI's latest family of models promises improvements across a range of areas, including cybersecurity.
The AI firm Anthropic has developed a technique that has given it the clearest glimpse yet at what’s really going on inside large language models as they answer questions or carry out tasks. What they found ranges from the mundane to the unnerving. Researchers at the company built a tool called the Jacobian lens (or…
Tomesphere Atlas 映射 850 万篇研究论文为交互式图谱,方便按领域、引用和时间浏览。
<a href="https://ai.meta.com/static-resource/muse-spark-1-1-evaluation-report" rel="nofollow">https://ai.meta.com/static-resource/muse-spark-1-1-evaluatio...</a> [pdf]<p><a href="https://developer.meta.com/ai/resources/blog/build-with-muse-spark/" rel="nofollow">https://developer.meta.com/ai/resources/blog/build-with-muse...</a><p><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/ar
“已经出现泛化涌现”
The AI ROI debate has returned and the numbers are even bigger, as are, perhaps, the consequences.
I don't know where this is headed, but I don't like it. https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/open-source-ai-model-scary-mythos GLM-5.2 can be downloaded by anybody, can be run on virtually any hardware, and unlike Mythos or Fable, there’s no vendor playing the middle man between the AI models and the users, raising the cybersecurity stakes considerably. Put simply, while these frontier models can aid researchers in patching holes in commonly used software, the can also be abused by hacke
arXiv:2607.06720v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Training large language models (LLMs) with extended reasoning has enabled in-context search, in which models iteratively generate, critique, and revise solution attempts. We provide a theoretical analysis of in-context search by modeling it as approximate inference over reasoning traces, where the base model defines a prior and self-reflection provides feedback for posterior updates, and study the resulting inference-time sampling complexity - the
arXiv:2607.06764v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent progress on ARC-AGI-1 from disclosed architectures has come broadly from two regimes: heavy test-time compute over frontier models (evolutionary search, exhaustive sampling, extended chain-of-thought), or benchmark-specific training in which small models are fine-tuned on ARC data, often with task-specialized architectures. We study a third regime: an open-weight model in non-thinking mode (DeepSeek V3.2) under a strict budget, with no ARC-
I am curious about intended sizings of the main size niches of the popular local LLM models. As in, we can see there is a major niche at 26b-35b, then hardly anything from 36 through 69b, then (formerly) another major niche at ~70b-72b, then another niche at ~120b-123b, then another big gap till ~230b-235b, and then it gets a bit more mixed all over the place after that with 300b-750b being scattered more randomly probably based more on just whatever the best strength per size they could get whe
arXiv:2607.07021v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard-to-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents. As AI agents, including large language models (LLMs), become embedded in daily life, they increasingly participate in such interactions and reshape social interaction structures. Yet they often fail to coordinate with humans in an effective, considerate, and natura
<article><div class="page-wrapper PostDetail-module-scss-module__UQuRMa__hero"><div class="PostDetail-module-scss-module__UQuRMa__illustrationHeroWrapper"><img alt="Inviting hard questions" class="PostDetail-module-scss-module__UQuRMa__heroImage" height="1125" src="https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/images/4zrzovbb/website/3fe58a56e696628496e95871e00b8287035ea645-2000x1125.jpg" width="2000" /></div></div><div class="page-wrapper"><article><div class=""><div class="Body-module-scss-module__z40yvW__bod